Heat source dimensioning: Difference between revisions

From HelpSystem
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:


==Problem description==
==Problem description==
We suggest that heat source dimensioning should always be consulted with the flat station producer. In case of particular data,  one of the following solutions should be adopted.
The way in which the heat source is dimensioned depends on the type of designed installation.
 
==Solution==
==Solution==
* If the heat source lacks a buffer tank - heat source dimensioning should adopt the ''<IS_TS id=sMocCalkowitaZr/>'' value.<br/>[[File:InstalSoft_-_InstalSystem_5_-_Flat_stations_-_Total_output_general_results.png|900 px|left|thumb|1. Total output.]]<br clear="all"/>
* If the heat source lacks a buffer tank - heat source dimensioning should adopt the ''<IS_TS id=sMocCalkowitaZr/>'' value.<br/>[[File:InstalSoft_-_InstalSystem_5_-_Flat_stations_-_Total_output_general_results.png|900 px|left|thumb|1. Total output.]]<br clear="all"/>

Revision as of 08:01, 14 December 2022

Product InstalSystem 5
Type of article TIP&TRICK
Source for translation 2020-04-05


Problem description

The way in which the heat source is dimensioned depends on the type of designed installation.

Solution

  • If the heat source lacks a buffer tank - heat source dimensioning should adopt the Total output value.
    1. Total output.

  • If the heat source includes a buffer tank - the indicated Total output value is the peak power that the buffer tank is supposed to deliver to the installation. We suggest that the heat source be dimensioned towards standard heat load of a building (or in case there are no norm calculations, towards total heat load of rooms) including not utilized heat loss of pipe-runs and losses of radiant systems to outside of source feed area.
    2. Standard heat load of building.


    3. Total rooms heat value.


    4. Heat loss of pipe-runs, losses of radiant systems.